Dr. Zaleha Aziz. 2016. Viva Voce. Universiti Malaysia Sabah UMS)

Batas toleransi KUM msg2 bidang

Amirullah

FORUM KARIR DOSEN INDONESIA (FKDI)

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2014. Pedoman Operasional Penilaian Angka Kredit Kenaikan Pangkat/Jabatan Akademik Dosen

LITERATURE REVIEW: OLD REFERENCES & TAKE HOME MESSAGES

Sharing what I scribbled on a thesis:

Two major weaknesses in the thesis Chapter 1 and 2.

1. Your literature is not up to date.

In chapter 1&2 , many references are old. Most are published before 2012. A few from 2013 and 2014. None in 2015-2017. People can question if your ‘research gap’ is still really a ‘gap’. Could it be that some people have already filled the gap and published something about what you are doing in 2015-2017. If this happens, your problem statement become invalid and the whole research has no contribution.

2. It is commendable that the literature review is already written using the “weaving technique”, putting a lot of your own words in between the various literature, telling a good “story”. However it does not provide a critical analysis of the literature. The literature review still seems disjointed and not directly related to your methodology. The review should be focused with a summary provided at the end of each Section and Chapter. In the summary, answer the “so what” question, and do not forget the “take home message”, You must relate the summary to your work, including choice of methods, equations, criteria, formulae, etc.

DrOY Postgraduate Guide

SYMBOLIC MEANING AND CONSUMERS’ RESPONSE

TO THE  ADVERTISEMENT WITH THE THEME OF CULTURAL DIVERSITY

Adi Susilo Jahja

Dian Nuranindya

ABFI Institute Perbanas Jakarta, Indonesia

The theme of unity of the nation is the interests of all elements of the Indonesian people that consists of many different ethnics and cultures. Indonesian state symbol has motto:  diversity in unity. Indomie, one of the biggest company  in producing noodles in Indonesia uses the theme of unity in the nation in its television ads, with the diversity of cultural displays. It is interesting that the noodles indeed not from Indonesian culture, but from China. The objective of this paper is to find out how consumers understand the symbolic meaning on the ad and how they respond to the ad. This research is a qualitative research conducted interviews with 20 students ABFII Perbanas Jakarta, Indonesia, which come from various tribes. This paper describes how consumers understand the cultural meaning of the ads, and the response of consumers who were interviewed stated that the ad appeared to have no effect on the number of their purchases.

Keywords: Symbolic meaning, consumers’ response, cultural diversity, advertising

Jahja, A. S., & Nuranindya, D. (2009). Symbolic meaning and consumers’ response to the ads with the theme of cultural diversity. In Proceedings of Business And Information (Vol. 6). Kuala Lumpur: Academy of Taiwan Information Systems Research. Retrieved from http://bai2009.org

Hacker, Diana, and Nancy Sommers. Rules for writers. Macmillan, 2011.

POIN-POIN USULAN REVISI Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen; diajukan oleh Asosiasi Dosen Indonesia (ADI) pada tanggal 17 Januari 2018 dalam acara dengar pendapat umum komite III DPD-RI, dalam rangka inventarisasi materi penyusunan rancangan undang-undang tentang perubahan atas UU No. 14 tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.

Asosiasi Dosen Indonesia, 19 Januari 2018

Menyusun pertanyaan riset, tujuan dan sasaran baik untuk riset kuantitatif maupun kualitatif

Kuantitatif: deskriptif, komparatif dan hubungan
Kualitatif: kontekstual, eksplanatori, evaluatif, generatif, ideologis, eksploratori, deskriptif, emansipatori

Doody O, Bailey ME (2016) Setting a research question, aim and objective.
Nurse Researcher. 23, 4, 19-23.

https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/NURS239/%CE%A0%CE%95%CE%A4%CE%A1%CE%9F%CE%A3%20%CE%93%CE%91%CE%9B%CE%91%CE%9D%CE%97%CE%A3/%CE%91%CE%A1%CE%98%CE%A1%CE%91/research.pdf

Kopertis12

Jurnal Scopus Indonesia – link

Jurnal Scopus Malaysia – link

ANTARA YANG MENARIK GUIDE INI

1. 8 STEP GUIDE CONDUCTING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (SLR).
2. FIGURE: A SYSTEMATIC GUIDE TO LITERATURE REVIEW DEVELOPMENT.
3. ARTICLE OKOLI (2015) INI TURUT MENYEDIAKAN PELABAGAI GUIDE LAIN CONTOHNYA SYNTHESIS, TERMINOLOGY, PROTOCOL, PRACTICAL TIPS & MACAM2 LAGI.

Nurul Fadly Habidin

Okoli, Chitu. “A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 37 (2015).

40 questions often asked during viva.

1. Can you start by summarising your thesis?
2. Now, can you summarise it in one sentence?
3. What is the idea that binds your thesis together?
4. What motivated and inspired you to carry out this research?
5. What are the main issues and debates in this subject area?
6. Which of these does your research address?
7. Why is the problem you have tackled worth tackling?
8. Who has had the strongest influence in the development of your subject area in       theory and practice?.
9. Which are the three most important papers that relate to your thesis?
10. What published work is closest to yours? How is your work different?
11. What do you know about the history of [insert something relevant]?
12. How does your work relate to [insert something relevant]?
13. What are the most recent major developments in your area?
14. How did your research questions emerge?
15. What were the crucial research decisions you made?
16. Why did you use this research methodology?
17. What did you gain from it?
18. What were the alternatives to this methodology?
19. What would you have gained by using another approach?
20. How did you deal with the ethical implications of your work?
21. How has your view of your research topic changed?
22. How have you evaluated your work?
23. How do you know that your findings are correct?
24. What are the strongest/weakest parts of your work?
25. What would have improved your work?
26. To what extent do your contributions generalise?
27. Who will be most interested in your work?
28. What is the relevance of your work to other researchers?
29. What is the relevance of your work to practitioners?
30. Which aspects of your work do you intend to publish – and where?
31. Summarise your key findings.
32. Which of these findings are the most interesting to you? Why?
33. How do your findings relate to literature in your field?
34. What are the contributions to knowledge of your thesis?
35. How long-term are these contributions?
36. What are the main achievements of your research?
37. What have you learned from the process of doing your PhD?
38. What advice would you give to a research student entering this area?
39. You propose future research. How would you start this?
40. What would be the difficulties?
41. And, finally… What have you done that merits a PhD?

http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/ResearchEssentials/?p=156