Trafford and Leshem (2008). Map your thesis.

• Mengapa survei, apa kelebihannya?
• Apa yang dimaksud dengan desain survei?
• Populasi, sapling, unit analisis
• Pengembangan instrumen survei
• Variabel
• Jenis pertanyaan survei Penjelasan analsis data dan pelaporan

Priscilla A. Glasow. 2005. Fundamentals of Survey Research Methodology

Mohd Yusri Ibrahim

1. Guilfort (1954) recommend minimum sample size 200 for consistent factor recovery.
2. Comrey (1973) suggest a range minimum sample sizes, from 50 (very poor) to 1000 (excellent) and advised to researcher sample size larger than 500.
3. Gorsuch (1974) sample size below 50 (small) & above 200 (larger).
4. Cattell (1978) proposed 500 would be a good sample size & however 200 or 250 could be acceptable.
5. Boomsma (1982) sample size less 100 (dangerous) & recommend 200 (safe) sample size.
6. Maccallum et al., (199) & maccallum et al., (2001) minum sample size of 60.
7. Sapnas and Zeller (2002) sample size range 50-100 was adequate.
8. etc.

de Winter, JCF de, D. I. M. I. T. R. A. Dodou∗, and P. A. Wieringa. “Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes.” Multivariate behavioral research 44, no. 2 (2009): 147-181.

• Mengapa skala Likert?
• Variasi skala Likert
• Apakah skala 7 lebih baik dari skala 5?
• …

Joshi, Ankur, Saket Kale, Satish Chandel, and D. K. Pal. “Likert scale: Explored and explained.” British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 7, no. 4 (2015): 396.

Diskusi Skala Likert:
DSG
ResearchGate

128 Words to Use Instead of “Very”

ProofreadingServices.com

Minimum Sample Size untuk SEM?

~~Structural Equation Model (SEM)~~

Erika J. Wolf, Kelly M. Harrington, Shaunna L. Clark, and Mark W. Miller. 2013. Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and psychological measurement 73, no. 6 (2013): 913-934.

1. Communicating with your advisor

Janpeter Schilling page 6

Kostas Bonatsos page 10

2. Time and self-management

Bente Tiedje page 14

3. Managing and organizing information

Hyung Sik Choi page 18

4. Work-life balance

Pavan Kumar Siligam page 22

Jana Peters page 26

5. Oral presentations

Oliver Kunst page 30

Ralph Rösner page 34

6. Scientific writing

Maria Koon page 38

7. Publishing

Wenke Wegner page 42

8. Paper reviews

Oliver Krüger page 46

9. Networking

Laura Niederdrenk page 50

10. Interdisciplinary work

Alexandra Kroll page 54

Christine Radermacher page 58

11. Literature

Johanna Baehr. 2011. How to survive your PhD-Essays from KlimaCampus Graduate Students.

Melewati tahap-tahap: uninformed optimism, informed optimism, valley of shit, informed optimism

Julio Peironcely. 17 Simple Strategies To Survive Your PhD. nextscientist.com