Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?. Journal of advanced nursing, 26(3), 623-630.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Publications.

Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (pp. 169-186). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 1994. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

1. Homogeneous samples (Holloway and Wheeler, 1996; Patton, 2002; Robson, 2002) chosen to give a detailed picture of a particular phenomenon – for example, individuals who belong to the same subculture or have the same characteristics. This allows for detailed investigation of social processes in a specified context.
2. Heterogeneous samples (Holloway and Wheeler, 1996; Robson, 2002) or maximum variation sampling (Patton, 2002) where there is a deliberate strategy to include phenomena which vary widely from each other. The aim is to identify central themes which cut across the variety of cases or people.
3. Extreme case or deviant sampling (Patton, 2002; Robson, 2002). Cases are chosen because they are unusual or special and therefore potentially enlightening. The logic is that learning about phenomena is heightened by looking at exceptions or extremes (for example, ethnomethodologists sometimes use deviant sampling to expose implicit assumptions and norms).
4. Intensity sampling (Patton, 2002) which employs similar logic to extreme or deviant case sampling but focuses on cases which strongly represent the phenomena of interest rather than unusual cases.
5. Typical case sampling (Patton, 2002). Cases which characterize positions that are ‘normal’ or ‘average’ are selected to provide detailed profiling. This requires prior knowledge about overall patterns of response so that what is ‘typical’ is known (for example, participants might be selected from their responses to a survey).
6. Stratified purposive sampling (Patton, 2002), a hybrid approach in which the aim is to select groups that display variation on a particular phenomena but each of which is fairly homogeneous, so that subgroups can be compared.
7. Critical case sampling (Patton, 2002) in which cases are chosen on the basis that they demonstrate a phenomenon or position ‘dramatically’ or are pivotal in the delivery of a process or operation. The logic is that these cases will be ‘critical’ to any understanding offered by the research. Patton sees this approach as particularly valuable in evaluative research because it helps to draw attention to particular features of a process and can thus heighten the impact of the research.

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.

Momentum Pertumbuhan Publikasi

1. Peningkatan jumlah artikel ilmiah internasional Indonesia lebih cepat dari pada peningkatan jumlah lektor kepala dan profesor.
2. Pada bulan Agustus 2017 untuk pertamakalinya dalam 20 tahun Indonesia mengungguli Thailand. (05 Jan 2018: 18.865, 14.1915).
3. Jurnal Nasional bereputasi tinggi Internasional meningkat dari 0 (thn 2014) menjadi 36 (thn 2017).
4. Jurnal Nasional yang terindeks di Directory of Open Access Journal meningkat tajam dari 76 (thn 2014) menjadi 1255 (5 April 2018), No. 2 di dunia.
5. Jurnal Nasional Terakrediatasi meningkat dari 75 (2014) menjadi 283 (Nov 2017) menjadi 333 (Desember 2017).
6. 1682 jurnal elektronik telah dipilah (digrading) ke dalam kategori Sinta 1- Sinta 6.
7. Momentum ini harus dijaga; pengelola jurnal sangat besar perannya.

Sadjuga, Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi. 13 April 2018. Meningkatkan Kualitas Publikasi Ilmiah Direktur Pengelolaan Kekayaan Intelektual. Atmajaya Yogyakarta.

TIPS FOR PRODUCING ARTICLE FROM YOUR LITERATURE REVIEW

Claessens, 2007. A Review of Time Management Literature

Moving With the Flow: How to Write Coherently

Exercises Materials MPP SAC Coherent Writing Workshop 10 April 2018 Tuesday

Penggunaan bahasa Indonesia saat ini dalam kondisi yang memprihatinkan. Kita menyaksikan di ruang-ruang publik bahasa Indonesia nyaris tergeser oleh bahasa asing. Ruang publik yang seharusnya merupakan ruang yang menunjukkan identitas keindonesiaan melalui penggunaan bahasa Indonesia ternyata sudah banyak disesaki oleh bahasa asing. Berbagai papan nama, baik papan nama pertokoan, restoran, pusat-pusat perbelanjaan, hotel, perumahan, periklanan, maupun kain rentang hampir sebagian besar tertulis dalam bahasa asing.

Mutu penggunaan bahasa Indonesia dalam berbagai ranah, baik ranah kedinasan, pendidikan, jurnalistik, ekonomi, maupun perdagangan, juga belum membanggakan. Di dalam berbagai ranah tersebut, campur aduk penggunaan bahasa masih terjadi. Berbagai kaidah yang telah berhasil dibakukan dalam pengembangan bahasa juga belum sepenuhnya diindahkan oleh para pengguna bahasa.

Sementara itu, para pejabat negara, para cendekia, dan tokoh masyarakat, termasuk tokoh publik, yang seharusnya memberikan keteladanan dalam berbahasa Indonesia ternyata juga belum dapat memenuhi harapan masyarakat. Penghargaan kebahasaan yang pernah diberikan kepada para tokoh masyarakat tersebut tampaknya belum mampu
memotivasi mereka untuk memberikan keteladanan dalam berbahasa Indonesia.

Berbagai persoalan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa upaya pembinaan bahasa Indonesia pada berbagai lapisan masyarakat masih menghadapi tantangan yang cukup berat. Oleh karena itu, Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa—melalui Pusat Pembinaan dan Pemasyarakatan—masih perlu bekerja keras untuk membangkitkan kembali kecintaan dan kebanggaan masyarakat terhadap bahasaIndonesia. Upaya itu ditempuh melalui peningkatan sikap positif masyarakat terhadap bahasa Indonesia danpeningkatan mutu penggunaan bahasa Indonesia dalam berbagai ranah. Upaya itu juga dimaksudkan agar kedudukandan fungsi bahasa Indonesia, baik sebagai bahasa nasional maupun bahasa negara, makin mantap di tengah terpaangelombang globalisasi saat ini.

Untuk mewujudkan itu, telah disediakan berbagai bahan rujukan kebahasaan dan kesastraan.

1. KALIMAT
2. PEDOMAN UMUM EJAAN BAHASA INDONESIA
3. PARAGRAF
4. EJAAN
5. TATA ISTILAH
6. BENTUK DAN PILIHAN KATA
7. TESAURUS BAHASA INDONESIA
8. KAMUS BAHASA INDONESIA

Badan Pembinaan & Pengembangan Bahasa

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI

Informasi journal ilmiah bidang Business dan Management yang dapat dituju untuk publikasi di bidang masing-masing, dapat menggunakan daftar yang disusun oleh Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) yang dikelola oleh Australian Research Council (‘DIKTI’nya Australia) untuk keperluan akreditasi riset nasional mereka.

Daftar yang dibuat 2010 dan memuat ranking masing-masing journal, terbaik A*) dapat diunduh di:
2010 finalised journals in a Field of Research: Business and Management
Namun,
The ranked journal list is no longer available from the ARC website. This is because it was intended solely for the purposes of the ERA 2010 evaluation, and because journals may have changed significantly in the number of years since the rankings were developed. (ERA)

Update daftar terbaru ada di:
2015 submission journals in an ANZ Field of Research: Business and Management
tapi tanpa pemeringkatan.
Dalam daftar 2015 tesebut, ARC kerjasama dengan Scopus.
ARC Selects Elsevier’s Scopus for ERA 2015 Assessment

How to write a PhD lit review & develop a conceptual framework: steps, stages & specifics.

Prosemantic

How to write a PhD lit review & develop a conceptual framework: steps, stages & specifics.  Klik:

Bloomberg, L. D., & Volpe, M. (2012). Chapter 6. Developing and presenting your literature review. in Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end. Sage Publications.

Literature Review Organizer

Notar, C. E., & Cole, V. (2010). Literature review organizer. International Journal of Education, 2(2), 1.

Statistik parametrik dapat digunakan denga data Likert, ukuran sampel kecil, varians yang unequal, dan distribusi tidak normal tanpa kekhawatiran akan kesimpulan yang salah. Temuan ini sejalan dengan literatur empiris sepanjang 80 tahun.

Norman, Geoff. “Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics.” Advances in health sciences education 15.5 (2010): 625-632.

Skala Likert 10 butir lebih efisien dari skala likert 5 butir dalam mengoperasikan model pengukuran.

Skala Likert

Skala nominal, ordinal, interval, dan rasio

Parametric & non parametric

Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., & Mamat, M. (2015). The Likert scale analysis using parametric based Structural Equation Modeling ( SEM ). Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 4(1), 13–21.

Selected books, articles, and online resources providing information on qualitative methods

 Books covering multiple qualitative methods

Barbour R. Introducing qualitative research: a student’s guide to the craft of doing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications; 2007. 2

Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007. 9

Polit D, Beck, CT (editors). Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (International Edition). Philadelphia:

Lippincott, Williams, Wilkins; 2012. 33

Streubert H, Carpenter DR (editors). Qualitative research in nursing. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2011 37

Wertz F, Charmaz K, McCullen L, Josselson R, Anderson R, McSpadden E (editors). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis. New York: The

Guilford Press; 2011. 40

Books and articles focusing on a particular area of qualitative methodology

Phenomenology and hermeneutics

Dahlberg K, Dahlberg HK. Dialogue. Description vs. interpretation – a new understanding of an old dilemma in human science research. Nurs

Philos 2004;5(3):268–73. 10

Dahlberg K, Dahlberg H, Nystro¨ m M. Reflective lifeworld research. 2nd ed. Lund: Studentlittertur; 2008. 11

Dowling M. From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. Nurs Stud 2007;44:131–42. 12

Lindseth A, Norberg A. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

2004;18:145–153. 28

Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: The Althouse Press; 1997. 39

Ethnography

Fetterman D. Ethnography: step by step. 3rd. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2010. 14

Gobo G. Doing ethnography. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2008. 17

Kiefer C. Doing health anthropology: research methods for community assessment and change. New York: Springer Publishing; 2007. 22

Bazzano AN, Kirkwood BR, Tawiah-Agyemang C, Owusu-Agyei S, Adongo PB. Beyond symptom recognition: care-seeking for ill newborns in

rural Ghana. Trop Med Int Health 2008;13(1):123–28. 3

Grounded theory

Charmaz K. ‘‘Discovering’’ chronic illness: using grounded theory. Social Science and Medicine 1990;30(11):1161–72. 6

Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2006. 7

Content analysis

Elo S, Kynga¨ s H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2007;62(1):107–15. 13

Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures, and measures to achieve trustworthiness.

Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105–12. 18

Hsieh H-F, Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15(9):1277–88. 20

Qualitative interviewing

Gubrium J, Hostein J. Handbook of interview research: context and method. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001. 19

Kvale S, Brinkman S. InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009. 26

Kitzinger J The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn 1994;16:103–21. 23

Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. Br Med J 1995;311:299–302. 24

Kreuger R, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2009. 25

Trustworthiness and rigor

Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985. 27

Rolfe G. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs 2006;53(3):304–10. 35

Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inform 2004;22:63–75. 36

Links to open online resources

Phenomenology Online. ª 2011 van Manen, http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/

Center for Qualitative Research ª2011 Bournemouth University, http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/cqr/rescqrlnk.html

The Qualitative Report Copyright 1990-2011. Nova Southeastern University, Florida and Ronald J. Chenail, http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/web.html

International Journal of Qualitative Methods, http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index

Methodspace. ª2011 Sage, http://www.methodspace.com/page/links-qualitative-research

Books tips

Frank A. The wounded storyteller: body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1995 15

Mattingly C. Healing dramas and clinical plots. The narrative structure of experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. 30

Polkinghorne DE. Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1986. 34

Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2013). Orientation among multiple truths: An introduction to qualitative research. African Journal of emergency medicine, 3(2), 92-99.